![]() |
The 42nd Annual Midyear Meeting
of the Health Physics Society |
![]() |
The Health Physics Society invites members of the Society, other scientists and students to participate in the 42nd Annual Midyear Topical Meeting of the Health Physics Society to be held in San Antonio, TX, January 31- February 3, 2009.
Please submit your abstract on-line using the form below.
NOTE: Abstracts submitted via email will not be accepted.
Abstracts will be printed directly from your electronic submission. Minor editing (punctuation and grammar) may be performed on your abstract; you will not see a revised version before publication. If you experience problems or it is not possible to submit your abstract electronically, please contact the Secretariat at 703-790-1745 (or fax 703-790-2672) for further instructions.
Technical Sessions: Presentations may be in an oral or poster format. Oral presentations are 12 minutes, with an additional 2 minutes for questions. Those choosing the "Poster or Oral" option under the Presentation Format Section on the Abstract form will have the highest probability of acceptance. If there is a compelling reason that a presentation must be in either the oral or poster format exclusively, please explain the reason. Please indicate if you wish to withdraw your abstract in the event that your preference cannot be accommodated.
NOTES:
A submitted abstract is a commitment to present; cancellations should be avoided.
If extenuating circumstances prevent the presenting author from making the presentation, it is the author's responsibility to find an alternate presenter.
Presenters who submit more than one abstract and cancel must find alternate presenters; otherwise, you will be limited to one abstract for future meetings.
Technical Sessions:
Contributed abstracts are requested for sessions on the following topics:
Integration of agencies and resources & National Response Framework
Medical Response activities by hospital and emergency medical systems
Training and guidance for professionals, first responders, first receivers and members of the public in response to a radiological attack
Radiation Hazards from Radiological Dispersal Devices
Cleanup of areas affected by nuclear weapons or dispersal devices
Interdiction and security of radiological materials
Crisis Risk Communication
Border and Port Initiatives
Military response to catastrophic domestic incidents
Advances in instrumentation
Emergency Management Assistance Compacts
Author Eligibility: Any Society member may submit an abstract. Non-members desiring to present a paper or poster must be sponsored by a member. A member may sponsor only one non-member. This includes Special Session invitees (i.e., a Special Session organizer can sponsor only one paper in the session). Sponsors must endorse the abstract by including their name and HPS ID number on the electronic form.
Abstract Acceptance: Notification of acceptance will be sent to the presenting author during September 2008. Please note that the technical session you select is for Program Committee guidance only. Due to scheduling or topical interest, the Program Committee may find it necessary to reassign your presentation to a technical session different from what you selected.
|
PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS:
NOTE: Presenters who wish to make changes to their previously submitted computer presentation will be accommodated as availability allows. Revisions on CD R or flash drive media will be accepted; Minor revisions may be done on the computer in the Speaker Ready Room on a first-come, first-serve basis. |
Instructions for Submitting an Abstract
Specific Requirements:
All abstracts will be printed directly from this on-line submission form. Contact the Secretariat if you are unable to submit your abstract using the on-line submission form.
1. Title: Submit the title in upper and lower case, capitalizing each word. Acronyms should not be used.
2. Author(s): Use initials for the author's first (and middle) name(s). Indicate the presenting author. Contact the Secretariat for instructions if there are more than 6 authors.
3. Affiliation(s):
Enter the affiliation(s) in upper and lower case; e.g., University
of California, Berkeley.
Do not include department name or
full address.
4. Abstract: The abstract must be one concise paragraph. Do not include author names or affiliations. Credits should be placed at the end of the text of the abstract. Use an asterisk as an indicator of the credit.
(Note: The minimum abstract length is 150 words and the maximum size of the abstract is restricted to 2000 characters.)
5. Presenting Author Address: Include the complete mailing address. It is essential that the e-mail address is accurate because information or questions regarding abstracts and presentations will be sent via e-mail.
Additional Information
1. Abstracts that suggest commercialism, either through writing style or trade names, may be rejected.
2. Abstracts should not contain tables, figures, structural formulas, or bibliographic references.
NOTE: Limit use of equations to only those that are new and required to convey the central concepts of the abstract. You must use SI units. Contact the Secretariat if the abstract requires equations, math or Greek symbols, subscripts or superscripts (other than for isotopic identification).
3. Acronyms in the abstracts themselves should be accompanied by the spelled out words in parentheses.
4. The substance of the abstract must not have been presented or published previously.
5. Promissory statements, such as "will be discussed," "will be studied," or "will be analyzed", cannot be accepted. Use present tense, e.g., "is discussed," "is presented," "is analyzed." A well-written abstract includes results and conclusions, not promises.
6. The Program Committee's decision to accept or reject an abstract will be based upon inclusion of the following items.
a. Purpose and title of the work: Is the purpose clearly stated and are the issues current? Is the title descriptive of the abstract?
b. Experimental procedures (if applicable), analytical methods (if applicable) and discussion/review: Are the procedures well described? Is (Are) the discussion/review and/or analytical methods clearly presented?
c. Application or relevance to the field of Health Physics: Is the work relevant or directly applicable?
d. Conclusions: Are the conclusions based on an appropriate quality and quantity of data?
e. Appropriateness of material for presentation: Material which may be considered unprofessional or vulgar will be rejected. Material will not be rejected simply because it may be controversial.